glebora Talk to us
The method
Who it’s for
For coffee importers For cocoa importers Are you an operator? Pricing
Resources
Guides FAQ Glossary About Talk to us

Home › Pricing

Pricing

How pricing works.

No two supply chains look the same, so we don’t sell off-the-shelf tiers. We size the setup, the annual plan and any flagged-risk work to the supply chain you actually have. Here’s how we think about what that is worth, and what shapes your quote.

How we think about price

Priced to the risk it removes, not to our costs.

A filing isn’t a line-item you tick off: it’s what stands between your coffee or cocoa and a held shipment, a customer request you can’t answer, or a due-diligence file that doesn’t hold up when an authority looks at it. So we price against what’s at stake for a small importer, not the hours behind the work.

Expert judgement

You’re not paying for the data. It’s open. You’re paying for the type-aware read that helps tell shade-grown management from real clearing, and for a determination we stand behind.

Executed filing

We carry the whole due diligence and file the DDS as your EU-established Authorised Representative: the administrative burden off your desk, not a dashboard you operate yourself.

Defensible evidence

The legal responsibility stays yours, the operator’s, so what matters is the quality of the work behind your statement: a cross-referenced record built to stand up the day an authority asks.

What a filing includes

What you’re actually paying for.

A per-plot assessment

Every producer plot behind your consignment is checked for post-2020 conversion of forest to agricultural use, read across several authoritative datasets, in a way that distinguishes shade-grown management from genuine clearing.

The TRACES submission

We assemble the geolocation and due-diligence information into your Due Diligence Statement and file it in the EU’s TRACES system as your Authorised Representative, carrying your operator identity, then retrieve the reference number your buyers and the authorities may ask for.

A documented audit bundle

You keep a self-contained record: the plot geometry, the assessment and the evidence behind it, and the TRACES reference, the written answer to “how did you conclude this was deforestation-free?”, kept for the five years the regulation requires.

glebora Plot deforestation assessment
Baseline
31 Dec 2020
Datasets
GFC2020 · Hansen v1.13 · TMF 2025

Plots assessed: 2

Ghana · Ahafo, shade-grown cocoa Needs review

Location 6.738522, −2.561955| Plot size 0.72 ha

FindingMethod / datasetResult
Tree-cover loss, post-2020 Hansen GFC 2025 v1.13 0.35 ha
Confirmed deforestation JRC TMF vs 2020 baseline 0.00 ha

Held for human review. Loss is real, but JRC TMF confirms none of it is forest conversion, consistent with shade-tree management. Surfaced to a person, not auto-failed.

Brazil · Sul de Minas, coffee Pass

Location −21.715207, −46.438349| Plot size 4.59 ha

FindingMethod / datasetResult
Tree-cover loss, post-2020 Hansen GFC 2025 v1.13 0.00 ha
Confirmed deforestation JRC TMF vs 2020 baseline 0.00 ha

Pass. No post-2020 tree-cover loss on any source. Clears without human review.

See the full record: datasets, method and how it’s filed →

Real, unedited output from our deforestation engine, run on two public reference plots. The Ghana plot is a public reference farm, not a client plot: CERSGIS, Reference Dataset for Land Use Change Mapping in Ghana’s Cocoa Landscape (2024-2025), CC-BY 4.0.

How a quote is built

A quote has three parts, so it follows your supply chain instead of a rigid list:

  • A one-off setup: the mandate, gathering and cleaning your plot geolocation, mapping who supplies what, and the first full assessment. This is where messy source data shows up, and it is the part that differs most from one importer to the next. It also puts the formal written EUDR mandate in place and links your TRACES account to ours: what authorises us to file on your behalf, with your supply-chain data kept cleanly siloed.
  • An annual operator plan: the part that carries most of the value. Your plots stay under watch through the year, get re-assessed as new forest data lands, and every Due Diligence Statement is filed as your Authorised Representative, with your audit bundle kept current. Filing is included, not metered: we are not going to charge you for pressing submit.
  • Expert work when a plot is flagged, the times the assessment surfaces something a person has to settle: a shade-canopy false alarm to take apart, a boundary to re-cut, a supplier to go back to. Billed as it happens, and only then. A quiet season stays a quiet invoice.

What moves the numbers within that is the shape of the work, not the size of your business:

  • how ready your geolocation already is: the single biggest swing there is, and the reason two importers of the same volume can be a world apart;
  • how many producer plots sit behind your imports, and across how many origins and suppliers you have to reach to get them;
  • how much of that land is likely to argue with the satellite record: agroforestry origins raise questions a single map answers badly, and answering them properly is expert time.

What actually drives the cost

The same container, three very different jobs.

Plot count is the number everyone reaches for, and on its own it is the wrong one. Twelve plots scattered through a WhatsApp thread are more work than forty polygons from a well-run cooperative. Three shapes to hold your own chain against: find the one that reads closest to yours.

The single-origin specialist

  • OriginsOne
  • Producer plots~50
  • SuppliersA single cooperative
  • GeolocationPolygons, already mapped

You buy one origin from one cooperative, and you have bought from them for years. When you ask for plot boundaries, somebody there actually has them, mapped once for a certification audit and exported as polygons that are mostly sane. Setup is short: we take the file, check the geometry against what the regulation asks of it, sort out the handful of parcels that come back malformed or land in the wrong hemisphere, and run the baseline assessment.

Then it is a quiet year. The plots do not move, the origin does not change, and the annual plan runs largely in the background: monitoring, re-assessment as new data lands, and statements filed when your shipments need them.

This is about as little as a real supply chain can ask of us. If yours looks like this, say so in the first message. It belongs in your quote.

One-off setup€900-€1,500
Annual plan€1,800-€2,800/yr

Flagged-risk work is rare on a chain this clean, and billed per item only if it comes up.

The multi-origin network

  • OriginsThree countries
  • Producer plots~400
  • SuppliersExporters and co-ops
  • GeolocationScattered points, mixed formats

Three countries, several exporters, and something like four hundred smallholder plots behind a season of containers. The geolocation arrives as it arrives: clean polygons from one co-op, a spreadsheet of hand-typed GPS points from the next, and from the third a promise that someone will send something. Points with no area beside them, coordinates rounded until they are no longer precise enough to file, duplicate rows, a farm recorded in the middle of a river.

Most of the setup here is not satellite work at all. It is going back to suppliers, on their schedule, until every plot behind your imports is located to the standard the regulation actually asks for. Then comes the part that separates this shape from the first: shade canopy. Agroforestry origins raise questions a single map answers badly: pruned and thinned shade trees look much like tree-cover loss from orbit. Each of those is read across the baseline, the change record and the disturbance classification, and where it is farm management rather than clearing, the reasoning is written down so it stands up when somebody asks you for it.

The four hundred is not what costs you. Supplier chasing and the plots that argue back are, which is why flagged work is priced where you can see it, rather than buried in a bigger number you pay whether it happens or not.

One-off setup€2,500-€4,500
Annual plan€3,500-€5,500/yr

Expect several flagged plots across a season here: each billed as it is resolved, so a quiet season stays a quiet invoice.

The indirect buyer

  • OriginsTwo or three, at arm’s length
  • Producer plotsUnknown at the start
  • SuppliersA trader or exporter
  • GeolocationHeld by someone upstream

You buy through a trader or on the spot market, and if you are the first EU-established party placing those goods on the EU market, the operator’s duty is yours, even though you have never spoken to a farm. The plots exist somewhere upstream, held by a party who owes you nothing in particular. Working out how much of that data really exists is itself the first piece of work, and no honest quote can skip it.

So this shape tends to start small and then tell you what it is. One origin turns out to be documented down to the plot; the next turns out to be three intermediaries deep, and the answer is a contract clause and a season of asking. Better to learn that from a sample in the quiet months than from a container in the middle of your buying season.

What drives it here is distance from the land: how many links in the chain have to be opened before the plots are yours to file on.

Supply-Chain Diagnostic€600-€1,200
Annual planSized once the chain is mapped

A tangible read of your exposure and how filing-ready the data really is, yours to keep either way, and credited toward your annual plan if you go ahead.

Plenty of chains will borrow from more than one of these: a clean origin sitting beside a chaotic one is an ordinary enough picture. The pattern holds either way: what you pay tracks how much of this you already have in order, not how big you are. None of the above is a quote. It is what we are listening for when you tell us about your supply chain.

Size it yourself

Roughly how complex is your supply chain?

Answer three questions and this shows where your supply chain sits: which of the three shapes above it reads closest to, and what’s driving that. It points you at a band rather than printing one exact number: your figure lands inside that band once we’ve seen a sample of your real data.

The best first step

Send one sample plot for a free readiness check.

The surest way to know what your filing involves (and what it costs) is to let us look at a real plot. Send one set of producer coordinates and we’ll come back with a read on how filing-ready the data is and a clear picture of the work, no obligation. From there the figure is set directly, around your commodities, your plots, and your filing cadence.

Send a sample plot

contact@glebora.com